
The map alongside shows an assessment of Tranquillity across the West Midlands.
The darker the green the more tranquil the area ranging to red, the least
tranquil areas. As may be expected the city of Birmingham is the least tranquil
part of the West Midlands and other towns such as Stafford and Newcastle are
similarly coloured.
The definition of tranquillity?
Tranquillity is the quality of calm experienced in places with mainly natural
features and activities, free from disturbance from manmade ones.
Tranquil areas are places where a quality of calm can be experienced in the
presence of mainly natural features and activities, and the absence of disturbance
from manmade ones.
We believe efforts to protect and enhance tranquil areas would help the Government
to address these priorities. There is growing and substantial evidence to
show that exposure to nature can contribute to physical health and psychological
wellbeing. While there are different levels of contact with nature - views
of natural features, incidental exposure to nature and being active in a natural
environment - tranquil areas represent reservoirs of natural features. These
provide access to a green environment which can offer a wide range of health
benefits.
CPRE believes that the preservation and protection of tranquil areas is
of immense benefit to society and should be one of the key parameters in assessing
development of all types. Cpre will be campaigning to try to ensure
that tranquillity is seriously considered troughout planning phases.
Protecting tranquillity through environmental appraisal
There are two types of environmental appraisals:
· A sustainability appraisal (SA), which is undertaken on plans and
programmes such as regional spatial strategies and local development documents
and which incorporates strategic environmental assessment (SEA)
· An environmental impact assessment (EIA), which is carried out on
individual large planning applications
The 'EIA directive' (European Directive 85/337) became law in 1998; the 'SEA Directive' (European Directive 2001/42/EC) in 2004.
Both types of appraisal aim to improve decision-making by avoiding or mitigating changes that could significantly affect the environment. Deciding what is 'significant' is open to interpretation. So it's up to you to convince local planners that tranquillity is a key part of our environment that needs protecting in their policies. How can you do that? Read on.
Why tranquillity should be part of environmental appraisal
Getting planners to consider tranquillity in environmental appraisals is useful
because it could:
· Generate new policy ideas for protecting and extending tranquillity
· Improve the likelihood of a proposed development plan policy on tranquillity
being adopted.
The Government's Practical Guide to the SEA Directive (Figure 11, page 65) suggests that the 'proportion of tranquil areas' could be used as an SEA Indicator.
The Government guide Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial Strategies
and Local Development Documents (Appendix 6, Figure 17, p.91) suggests the
following questions could help decide which baseline information to collect
for a sustainability appraisal:
· (For Regional Spatial Strategies) 'Are there any parts of the region
that have been defined as tranquil areas and how have these changed over time?'
· (For Local Development Documents) 'Are there any parts of the plan
area that suffer from excessive noise levels?'
Appendix 13 (p.137) of the same guide suggests that the loss of tranquillity (alongside changes in landscape, economic decline and climate change) is an example of a cumulative, synergistic or secondary effect of change and states that 'these effects are very hard to deal with on a project by project basis through EIA it is at the SA level that these effects are most effectively identified and addressed'.
Getting tranquillity into sustainability appraisals
You have the opportunity to push for tranquillity protection at several stages
in the process of SA (stages A, B and D).
Stage A: Use CPRE's tranquillity maps as a baseline indicator of tranquillity
and make tranquillity protection an explicit SA objective
Stage A is when an SA report is being prepared, before formal consultation
takes place. You need to get in early and persuade your local planners that
tranquillity is a significant environmental issue in your area, and that using
CPRE's tranquillity materials can help them produce a sound plan to protect
and enhance it. You can also mention that Government guidance encourages regional
planning bodies and local planning authorities to identify sustainability
issues for appraisal in consultation with stakeholders and the public (Office
of the Deputy Prime Minister, Sustainability Appraisal of Regional Spatial
Strategies and Local Development Documents 2005, para 2.2.13, and 3.2.11).
The SEA Directive requires planning authorities to report on the current state of the environment ('the baseline') and how it will evolve without the implementation of the plan or programme. You could encourage planners to use CPRE's tranquillity map to form part of this baseline. For example, the SAs of both the Derbyshire Local Transport Plan and the Norfolk Minerals and Waste Development Framework (both produced in 2005) use CPRE's 1990s tranquillity map as an indicator of landscape character. We hope that future sustainability appraisals will use our new tranquillity map, which is based on a more sophisticated and rigorous methodology.
You also have an opportunity at this stage to influence what goes in the SA framework, another key part of the SA report. All planning policies are required to be evaluated against the SA framework. The framework, in turn, should be taken into account when the planners develop their project plan (for a regional spatial strategy) or local development scheme (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, 2005, op cit, para 2.2.5 and 3.3.2).
The SA framework consists of a series of objectives. You could ask that protecting
tranquillity be made a specific objective, as has happened elsewhere, such
as:
· In the 2005 Local Transport Plan for Telford and Wrekin (objective:
'protect areas of both urban and rural tranquillity')
· In the SA of the Tynedale draft core strategy (February 2006), where
protecting tranquil areas is part of a checklist under Sustainability Objective
10
Stage B: Improve tranquillity through mitigation measures
Once objectives and indicators have been set, planners have to generate policy
options and justify a preferred policy in relation to the appraisal findings,
with a view to minimising environmental harm. Government guidance encourages
public participation in this stage of the process (Office of the Deputy Prime
Minister, 2005, op cit, para 2.3.2 and 3.3.2).
A number of SAs in the most recent round of Local Transport
Plans have generated new policy ideas for improving as well as merely protecting
tranquillity. Show your planners the examples from Medway and Telford and
Wrekin:
· The SA of Medway Council's Local Transport Plan identifies an opportunity
to reduce the damage to tranquillity from transport at specific noise-sensitive
locations, such as schools and nurseries
· Telford and Wrekin Council has generated a number of mitigation measures
to protect tranquillity, such as using noise-reducing surfacing in road resurfacing
works and replacing existing public transport vehicles when redundant with
low-noise vehicles
Back to Top